‘Intentions are not enough…’: UN nuclear chief says Iran nuclear pledge needs ‘very strong verification’

‘Intentions are not enough…’: UN Nuclear Chief Calls for Strong Verification of Iran’s Nuclear Pledge

Theindiapostdaily.com – The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director, Rafael Grossi, highlighted the necessity of robust oversight during a recent address, stating that Iran’s assurance to refrain from nuclear weapon development requires “very strong verification.” This comes as Tehran and Washington engage in discussions to finalize a long-term accord aimed at resolving their ongoing tensions, according to AFP.

Negotiation Context

Iran’s nuclear program remains a focal point of the talks, which are meant to conclude a Middle East conflict that erupted in late February after significant US and Israeli military actions. A preliminary agreement was signed last week between the two nations to pause hostilities, with future discussions expected to tackle various disputes, including Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Verification Challenges

Contradictory reports have emerged regarding the access of UN inspectors to Iranian nuclear sites. Grossi emphasized that while Iran has publicly stated its intent to abandon nuclear weapons, such declarations must be supported by a reliable verification mechanism. “Intentions alone are insufficient,” he remarked. “We must establish a comprehensive system to monitor progress effectively.”

“The objective of this agreement is to ensure Iran does not advance its nuclear weapon capabilities. Their government has made this clear,” Grossi said.

The IAEA has only begun initial discussions with Iran since the US-Iran deal was reached, underscoring the cautious approach taken by the agency. Under the agreement, Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium will be reduced through a process known as “downblending,” overseen by IAEA inspectors.

Before the conflict, the IAEA estimated Iran held approximately 440 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60% purity, which is below the threshold for weaponization. However, the exact current level of this stockpile is unclear due to the US and Israeli strikes on Iranian facilities in June.

Public Sentiment

Residents in Tehran expressed skepticism about the tangible effects of the diplomatic progress. A government worker, Amir, 28, noted, “Overall, nothing has improved. Life has simply become more difficult.” A content creator, Mehdi, 35, added, “Until changes are felt in daily life, hope will remain mixed with doubt, and anticipation will lead to exhaustion and anxiety,” AFP reported.

Historical Tensions

Iran’s nuclear program has been a source of contention with Western nations, who suspect Tehran of pursuing a bomb despite repeated denials. US President Donald Trump claimed on Tuesday that Iran had “fully and completely agreed” to allow IAEA inspections, while Grossi confirmed on Wednesday that “inspections of Iranian nuclear sites are going to happen.”

Despite these claims, Iran has shown reluctance to fully cooperate with the IAEA, having suspended collaboration following the June attacks. The 2015 nuclear deal, which imposed limits on Iran’s program in exchange for sanctions relief, was abandoned by Trump during his first term. The current agreement seeks to revive this framework, though challenges persist.

Strait of Hormuz Dispute

As part of the negotiations, control of the Strait of Hormuz—a vital maritime route between Iran and Oman—has become a major point of contention. This narrow passage is crucial for global energy transport, and Iran’s closure of the strait during the conflict has intensified its strategic importance.

On Wednesday, an attack on a vessel in the strait prompted the UN to delay efforts to rescue stranded sailors, who have been trapped since the war began. The UK Maritime Trade Office noted that a cargo ship was struck on the starboard side by an unknown projectile, though no casualties were reported.

Iran also plans to impose fees on ships using the strait, a move opposed by Washington and most Gulf states. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, during a Gulf visit, dismissed the proposal, warning that it could lead to “total chaos.” Rubio stressed that the US seeks a deal with Iran but is unwilling to accept terms that compromise its interests.