MP High Court stays FSSAI’s ban on whisky, Khargone firm rum; 11 TASMAC brands cleared
MP High Court stays FSSAI ban on whisky and rum
Theindiapostdaily.com – The Madhya Pradesh High Court has issued a significant interim order, effectively MP High Court stays FSSAI's prohibition on certain liquor brands. This development comes after the regulator banned pre-packaged whisky and rum manufactured by a private company in Madhya Pradesh’s Khargone district. The legal intervention ensures that the affected products can continue to be sold while the case is pending. The court's decision provides relief to the petitioner, Associated Alcohols and Breweries Limited, which had challenged the regulatory action.
According to reports, the Tamil Nadu Prohibition and Excise Department has also lifted a temporary restriction on the sale of 11 liquor brands retailed through state-run TASMAC outlets. This clearance occurred just three days after the initial ban was imposed. The department instructed the TASMAC managing director to allow the affected products to be transported from depots and sold at retail outlets again. This parallel development highlights the broader impact of the regulatory scrutiny on liquor manufacturers across different states.
HC Interim Stay and Legal Arguments
A division bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, comprising Justices Subodh Abhyankar and Alok Awasthi, issued the interim stay on August 6. The bench heard a plea filed by Associated Alcohols and Breweries Limited against the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) prohibition order dated July 29. The court put the ban on hold until the next hearing on September 7. The bench observed that the regulator had issued the restriction without taking into account the company’s response to the show-cause notice.
“Thus, considering the fact that otherwise the petitioner’s products, namely, Pre-packed whisky and Rum as mentioned in the impugned order of prohibition comply with the parameters as provided under the Excise Act and the Rules made thereunder, it is directed that till the next date of hearing operation and effect of the impugned order of prohibition dated 29.07.2026 shall remain stayed,” the bench said.
The court also asked the Centre to submit its response within four weeks. The FSSAI had relied on a preliminary laboratory report while issuing its prohibition order. The regulator stated that the labels on the products disclosed the use of “added nature identical and artificial (rum) flavour
Related Reading
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MP High Court stays FSSAI s ban?MP High Court stays FSSAI s ban is the main topic of this guide. The article explains the context, practical details, and next steps readers should understand.
Why does MP High Court stays FSSAI s ban matter?MP High Court stays FSSAI s ban matters because readers are looking for a useful answer, not just a short summary. Good content should match search intent and help them decide what to do next.